The Memory of Water - Homeopathy Homeopathy The memory of water is systematically denied by the courts scientists, because the present theoretical model can not explain it.
Homeopathy is probably the most striking to be numerous cases where it seems to occur, including its application on animals where the placebo effect is not justified.
On several occasions, one under the strict supervision of the team of the journal Nature, homeopathic water had an effect "theoretically impossible", but real. The experiment in question made by the team of scientist Jacques Benveniste was rejected by Nature, not the test of double blind, although it produced relevant results when it was not subjected to double-blind test.
double-blind method is an important part of the scientific method, used to prevent research results prove to be "influenced" by the placebo effect or observer bias. Blind research is an important tool in many research fields, from medicine to psychology, and social sciences to forensic science.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doble_ciego
However, observer bias, is the crucial fact that determines the outcome of a physical experiment when it occurs in the domain quantum space-time, several experiments confirm this.
Can you keep the validity of the double-blind trial in this case, it is precisely "observer bias" a phenomenon that impossible? The current theoretical framework, homeopathy can not explain, but there is another theoretical framework "discarded" by the courts scientists, without any proof, that if you offer an explanation for homeopathy: "The hologram" proposed by David Bohm. If true
homeopathy, there should be a space-time framework capable of containing the information that the particles of water can not contain that information then interact producing homeopathic effects. It is therefore all the water molecules, "the hologram of water" proposed by David Bohm and not every one of the particles, the carrier of information ... and I think that loads all the current theoretical framework.
One consequence of this confirmation, it would be the questioning of the conclusions offered by the "experts" about the risk of tearing the space-time with the paticular
Accelerator in an attempt to reproduce the moments after the big bang, since they, do not include in its conclusions, that David Bohm's holographic model is true, do not provide that beyond physics can be a "space-time structure of total interconnection" can be affected by such a "breakdown" of spacetime.
