Islamic Happy Marriage Msgs

The perfume. Tom Tykwer. 2006

no mistake. This film is bad.

is bad for many reasons. The first is that it lasts far too long (147 minutes!)
Then there are other reasons that are more reasonable, since it is judged by the film footage.
For starters, throughout the length films include boring things. The story comes down to a man with a wonderful smell, which seeks to capture the fragrance that once smelled a girl, and as it is able to capture the smell of women, frustrated. There.
No more than that. And with that, the director seeks a mystique that maybe in the book is nice, resultón, and going beyond that would pretty (according to taste of course), but Heavy shown here, tiresome and stupid of all all.

Le film is mediocre voice-overs, because as in 80% of the time have the protagonist running around sniffing, there is a narrator who tells us what the protagonist thinks. It is an abuse. The voice is so childish an action script to plug gaps do not understand how you can brew here. Example (Fulanito Then, thinking that would get such a thing, he prepared to leave for I know not where to seek the happiness. But to get such a thing happened that made him think about that girl I had known ... etc. ) An insult to the viewer.
This is the plan during the first two hours. See Ben Wishaw (an English actor who promises a lot) instead of talking sniffing and a voiceover that explains everything.

Then there is the claim of Dustin Hoffman, here comes a piece of paper worth no more than secondary. And the other actors are rags script. There are rave in the Bruckheimer-style assembly, ie, faster planes in which the camera moves over the landscape a few miles through valleys and hills (as in The Sea Inside as well), which only become more ridiculous approach the movie that the guy sniff things miles and also strive to prove it.
has many musical crescendos, but not dramatic (Except perhaps the pre-outcome) and has a 15-minute tickets are a real pain in the ass (not poetic or beautiful) are boring.

But if something is bad this movie is for a final abhorrent. A final in which there is an orgy heterosexual irrelevantly and inexplicable in history. It is a kind of "let's change of pace, and invent more asshole end you can imagine." Unfortunate to say the least. Until 2 o'clock in the movie thought it was mediocre and boring. After watching the final (and as longer and rejoices in itself) I think it's a shit. This forceful.
In film I began to laugh non-stop (spoiler: seeing a bishop does not have an orgasm Priceless).

And finally I would add that the book is an international bestseller and has read all the world does not justify a pathetic story like this. As The Da Vinci Code book and simpleton explicitly mediocre, and boring movie without more, give thousand turns to an adaptation like this, to give the first example that comes to my head. And I say that Dan Brown seems like a bad writer and Ron Howard a wimp. I've seen custom adaptations that made it more honor to his literary version (eg, Red Dragon).
never read a book based on such a story.

It is as if he had seen an adaptation of any short novel by Paulo Coelho. A mystical thing, boring, sappy and embarrassing.


Rating: 1

Mild Alchol Poisioning

After the glass. Agustí Villaronga. 1985

Agustí Villaronga Mallorcan is a director, in general, is quite unknown to national cinematography. The last thing it has reached us is the mockumentary Aro Tolbukhin: in the mind of the murderer (2002) on the Hungarian murderer in Guatemala. Other works include The Sea, 99.9 o Child of the moon. Most of these, like the actors who participate in them, are characterized by the strong presence of the Balearic archipelago.

Behind the glass (1985) is the first film of this man, and most critically acclaimed. It is well known in spite of this, and could even be said to be due to the relocation of the director within the time that was done. If you are looking in a glass cage (title translated into English that was released) will be almost more references in English. And it is considered cult for the transgression of their approaches.

film begins with a fairly young boy hanging naked hands. It is like a vision, and sado-masochistic pedophile for a redeemer. Beside him, a man does well presented photos of the child, comes over and licks his face with eyes still vice. After that, a camera accessory (therein lies the morbid game) the man takes a stick and pokes her child in the neck, as if it were a rabbit. That's when unhealthy complicity of director jumps to a third party who observes the scene from outside through a window. And that character is still unknown, it's us because it makes us complicit in what we have seen, marks the evolution of the film. After this disturbing impression, the camera (us) is / we the murderer from among some stairs to the battlements of a tower. We are waiting and silent man, with parsimony, pull vacuum.
So begins the film. That is the first 4 minutes. Traumatically incredible.

obviously know nothing based on this (hence the story), and what will emerge next is a story of hatred and despair, which leads to an unhealthy ideology based on the guilt of the past, the purge sin and the masochism of the victim. It's sort of like watching a movie from Chan-wook Park but tripe. The visceral issue here focuses on the victims, yes, but the difference is that these are now children.

Actors are four, including Marisa Paredes, who has a role not too protagonist and complies perfectly with the stigma of a bitter wife and bad, but basically defenseless. The others are the girl Gisele Echevarria (which would merely film), Günter Meisner (a second-tier German actor who made a jug of stuff for TV Germanic) and David Sust, the real star of the film, in my opinion not meet even a tenth of what their role in post-teen depraved madman promised. His character (Angelo) is embodied with the reluctance of Jorge Sanz of beginnings, with phrases recited almost without changes in tone and with a stiff rookie. This is one of the serious faults, because his character has no force or malice, but rather a stop homosexual Initial that you are not from the head.

Another point worth noting that the story is sickening, but will decline as everything progresses and the characters become blurred and disappear. Perhaps there are people that do not support such a degree of moral perversion, and this makes them be stupid questions would not be done about the executioner-victim relationship (that is the grace and originality), but going by that way, even for more tolerant audience, the film is mired in itself, as shown repeatedly disrupted it (and wants to show off), and that's not funny. And not funny because there was a 4-minute climax never reached again throughout the footage. It is as if the first should give you a punch in the face and then they were calling you a fool for an hour and a half. For this reason, the beginning and then it hits you do not mind so much.


Rating: 5

Welcome Note For Wedding Ceremony

infernal dolls. Tod Browning.

Tod Browning was not a director of one film. Although it is generally known to most as the creator of Freaks (The Freaks) back in 1932 and especially Dracula in 1931, with Bela Lugosi, and say that you have other outstanding works.
One of those tapes is this (The devil-doll) which at first was called The Witch of Timbuctoo, written exclusively for him.
Incredibly, Browning did not win either Dracula or with Freaks. With the first, Universal was not satisfied due to inconsistencies and Bela Lugosi script, while the second reviews were terrible and tore down the director's career.
was in the mid 20's when you get the real success, after recovering from a depression, abandoning his wife and alcoholism, he signed with MGM and after The Day of Faith, The Unholy Three is marked (The Unholy Three) a success would be repeated in a sound remake in 1930 with the same actors (this is the only sound appearance Lon Chaney).
Thus, we produce a series success in the late 20's as human jaws, a masterful story about a love triangle between circus characters, told in barely 70 minutes.
And after that, as I said, the failure would ensue with what are now considered his greatest works.
You could say that this film is the last along with Milagros sale, after which retire to a house in Malibu, where in 1942 his wife die and he would plunge into depression and cancer at the end of his life.

About the film that tells the story of a banker who escapes from a prison on Devil's Island, which has been submitted by false accusations of his three former partners. Obviously, you are looking for revenge, and regain the love of a daughter who always hated him for something he did not.
Through a friend, he discovers a potion that reduces the size and possess beings as slaves, and that's where he begins his revenge.
Arguably, this story is something like a freak version of The Count of Monte Cristo Dumas wrote already.

rub overacting actors and makeup are a bit loud, but see special effects like these , at the time they are shot has merit and beauty. When I saw this movie, immediately afterwards I went to see The Incredible Shrinking Man, by Jack Arnold (1951), which would repeat a similar formula, towering in the series B of the time. The comparison is odious, but I have to say that Arnold is far more boring than Browning. I do not mean that resemble arguments, but infernal dolls to have a growing pattern in which the characters reduced gag is a technical, while that of Jack Arnold is based solely on the action film and does little more , since it takes advantage of the social rejection that being has to bear no relations with his wife when it is small (moviegoer who gives nod Almodovar Talk to her and I think it's great. When one is tiny Fele Martínez seeps into the vagina of his lover).

recommended is a film with a simplicity typical of Browning, as the use of topical or droll characterizations, but that entertains a lot, is brief and tells a story of betrayal, revenge and paternal love, in which there are costumes, tiny slaves , theft, murder and final depression.

Rating: 8

How Much Do Racquetball Courts

1964 Race death in 2000. Paul Bartel. The three lights

This film is fun for several reasons. There is action, there are cartoonish and cheesy performances, no cars, no velocity, no hosts, no explosions, no naked aunts, there are bad not so bad, and there is no good!, and death is the fundamental element of the story.

Roger Corman in 1975, had already paid most of the time series B. Even you could say that continued to fund and roll the series B droll that we know of 50 and even directed the curious pieces with Vincent Price, Karloff and Lorre.
The director is an unknown actorucho he shot a few movies for decades, also including Cannonball, which is racing and the protagonist is David Carradine (also leaves Stallone).

And on the actors what to say. The principal is David Carradine, who here makes a kind of evil superhero dressed as Darth Vader (literal) and is dubbed Frankenstein. Then there's Sylvester Stallone, who started this film with his talent as a pilot. Before this was done porn (I have not researched a lot but it is well known) in 1968 makes an appearance at Bananas, Woody Allen (anthology making scene with another thug on the subway where there is no text) and after this little film success came to him with Rocky (1976). On the rest of the cast for nothing, many pretty girls of the time naked in some emerging and some actorzuelos escenilla mediocre roles.
The story goes that in 2000, in a hypothetical future, the U.S. is in a race car which is the national sport. In this race involving 5 cars "tuned" and must cross the whole country from coast to coast in the shortest possible time. And with one thing: run over people give points, worth more babies and the elderly, women and even more so than young men (Would not it be the other way around?).
Each car is the driver with his co-pilot, and the race goes through many adventures and mishaps.
Well, my feeling about all this is great. The film's argument point by point game Carmageddon. The aesthetics of the cars is so ... crappy (team A had more taste) that reminds me crazy cars. Carradine has to be Dick Dastardly. Stallone is a kind of beast, twisting his mouth and growls, and runs over (perhaps this was conceived the character of Rambo). And the other runners are not even remember because julandrón that dies at the first opportunity, and two aunts who hate and do not transcend. The struggle that keeps
Stallone Carradine is one of the games of the movie, but more, namely that Carradine (Frankenstein) provides for more. On one side is the roll with his co-driver (a blonde hottie) who plans to pounding her career with the aid of French rebels (yes friends, those who want to fuck the race are the Frogs). Then there's his reputation as a national hero who lives to run over. And on the other side a secret wish that routed to a particular destination. And is that all that much for a man, but not for a guy who is himself the grasshopper, Frankenstein and Bill. Because this guy wears a mask of Darth Vader (Star Wars is from 1977) to fool the rock, not to cover their flaws as Superman, but quite the opposite! Overflow
testosterone stale. That makes the guys laugh. Maybe because the bumper of his car has teeth, and of course, that gives you confidence in yourself.
Understand one thing. The year is 2000. It's the future. The people are Nazis. People enjoy watching others die on television. The president is a supreme being who lives in China. And the prize of the race is shaking hands with the supreme being (which incidentally is a sad bald). The French want to abolish democracy and race. The bad news is bad because society is bad, so not bad. And to make matters worse, his girlfriend he tries to kill all the time and he comes to say Come walk ... how many times do I have to forgive life to fuck.
Seriously, it's memorable. It is a top of the series B. It is impossible not to see certain persecution Spielberg in The Duel. Or that 70's light porn on other occasions. And all spiced up with some stereotypes master. There is even a fan who dresses as Frankenstein Virgin and sacrifices [see photo of girl in the front F] (After Frankenstein meets run her over his co-pilot asked him why did he do that?, Was in love with a laconic Me).
As a curiosity to say that Corman is funding a project for 2008 called Death Race 3000, which runs in 2020 ("imagine what would be run over with flying cars?)


Rating: 7

Anleitung D2nt Picklits

1975. Fritz Lang. Aaltra

This film is called Müde Der Tod degree in English and English Destiny Three lights. This is the first great movie of Fritz Lang and appear here as the keys to German expressionism Lang Metropolis would be their top and the references found. I speak of light, ghostly shadows, fortress walls, buildings deformed ...

The story takes almost two hours and is based on a young couple stops at an inn in a small town. Earlier, the coach gets on a mysterious man in black very scary. At the inn, while the girl goes to service the black man convinces the young man in love and leave together. After that no one turns to him and the girl starts to get his desperate boyfriend. Reaches the giant wall (no doors) that surrounds the estate of the man in black, and there, to observe a group of souls through the wall, takes place when dealing with the man in black, which is nothing but death.
The deal is to get three candles do not shut down (which are the souls of three loves in the past) and has until 11 to perform. Times and places are India hundreds of years ago, a former Muslim emirate and a Renaissance principality.
So far I can count.
The use of visual resources is reduced to shadows, frames and "appearances" (those negative spliced \u200b\u200btypical of the years 20). There are wonderful moments when it appears death, their poses, his charisma and his demeanor. And if anything stands out in the film is the simplicity of assembly and the grandeur of history.
I would say a simple love story, but the fact that Death himself plays a crucial role, which violates the time and space by going to different historical periods (as a challenge) and the outcome arises from the simplicity of love (think what they want), makes seeing her awesome movie gets the feeling that easier. Why? Because four planes pretty well speaks of love, life and death, and with much importance we can only open his mouth in amazement.
masterpiece.

Rating: 10

Kate Playground New Gallery

1921. Delépine Benoit and Gustave de Kervern.

Aaltra is a strange title for a strange film. It is a French film released here this year that should last a week in a vo cinema in Madrid and no more.
is written, directed and starring the two types of photo, Kervern Delépine and that what little they have done together have almost full. It is said to have returned to make another film called Avida, which is dated this year.

The film is digitally retouched black and white, with occasional negative saturation number. That black and white is a resource, I agree, but be very careful with this. I think that if the use of this technique is used to cover problems of script is like painting a piece of crap with gold leaf, behind now that if there is chicha, go ahead with the seriousness of black and white. And say that yes, some passages are very nice, photo gallery hear.

other hand, I will talk briefly about the history. It is here that the two protagonists, two neighbors who hate each other for problems of coexistence, simultaneously suffer an accident that leaves them paralyzed at the very beginning. There
begins the true story of two enemies who wish the death of another, which by dint of living and the odd chance they help each other.
I spend many mishaps, from thefts to beatings, and many other things that are joining in the disability. Once
"united" begins a life of rogues who do not find it ironic truth. Such situations are absurd, puerile, that leaves the viewer looking to spend the silences between a car leaves them on the road and another picks them up.

And I forgot to say a fundamental thing, is that this movie is paid for in part by Kaurismaki. That said, you know what to expect.

lasts about 85 minutes and can be seen, even with that absurd final say Fuck you, what kidding. And while talk of black humor all critical to ignore, because the fact that rogues are two invalids, who are bastards by the way, is not relevant to the kind of humor that arises here. Such humor is absurd and simple, wordless. But do not think ironic or cynical humor because it is so meager that goes beyond the event (a flood that isolates, an old impassively watching the motorized cart carried his elderly wife, etc.).

I do not mean that all this is a disadvantage, but tell that to prepare for a session in French Kaurismaki.
The film is original and gets into issues that are still taboo for many. That courage and above all, love.

Note: there is a freak moment in which a Finnish (because they travel to Finland) starts singing in a pub (there was a contest) the song Sunny. Until that happens, the jury (a bunch of tough guys) look without blinking at the guy who is about saying I love you.
Pints \u200b\u200bof guy: a kind of mixture of jogging suit jacket and American cowboy and pear-shaped belly giant (Giganticus peris). Look at the reindeer:



Rating: 6

Berger Paint Color Shades

2004 Dog Day Afternoon. Sidney Lumet.

say almost without question that all the films of bank robberies are as regards this film.

Yesterday I saw a piece of Swordfish, which had seen long ago and were putting on TV. It was the bank robbery scene, when the hostages have a bomb strapped around his neck collars. Instinctively I compared that with Dog Day Afternoon. The comparison was devastating, of course. I just go fuck theft that of Travolta, who had to take an army and wear necklaces enterito pump, while the poor Pacino, leaving him alone and entered the bank and he owned the place, and also had the support of all its hostages. By referring to something newer still, is the Hidden Plan of Spike Lee, where the "brother" makes a popcorn movie that I really liked, and no big deal, it amused me almost 2 hours and that, now , it is very rare.

End of elevation. The movie deals with a bank robbery by three thieves, who remain two guns straight out because you run away. Those two are Pacino and John Cazale (Fredo in The Godfather I and II and Stosh in The hunter), almost nothing.
But we can speak of a single protagonist because Pacino, a man "peculiar" problem, which aims to give the Sunset, is a good guy, the kind that looks for the good of all and which realizes the little people pointed a gun. Thus, at 10 minutes and is a colleague of the entire bank, and 20 would it gain the friendship of the public gathered outside around the media circus mounts, mostly because it will provide money and says things that nobody dares to say.

This movie talks about it, the power of the media. The fickleness of the mass and the American dream. I could say that the movie is a gripping thriller but I'd be lying, is a simple drama about the frustration of a nobody. And everything takes place almost entirely in the branch, one of those branches of American banks with their sickly black security officer, their old desks and other clichés seventies.

Here is the proof of everything I say. TV Newsman

 
 But I mean, why do you Need to 
 steal? Could you get a job? SONNY 
 
 
 Get a job doing what? You gotta be 
 a member of a union, no 
 union card - no job. To join the union, 
 you gotta get the job, But you do not get the job 
 Without the card. TV Newsman 
 
 
 What about, uh, non-union  
    occupations? 
  
      SONNY 
    Like what?  Bank teller?  What do 
    they get paid - 
     (now looks over at 
     girls who offer the 
     information - $135.37) 
    ... they pay one hundred thirty- 
    five dollars and thirty-seven cents 
    to start.  I got a wife and kids. 
    I can't live on that -- You want to 
    live on that?  What do you make a 
    week? 
  
      TV NEWSMAN 
     (swiftly, evasive) 
    I'm here to talk to you, Sonny, not 
    ... 
  
      SONNY 
    Wait a minute ... I'm talkin' to 
    you.  I'm askin' you a question ... 
  
      TV NEWSMAN 
    The audience  is interested in you, 
    Sonny ... not me. 
  
      SONNY 
    Yeah!  We're hot entertainment, 
    right?  You got me and Sal on TV ... 
    we're entertainment you sell, right? 
  
      TV NEWSMAN 
    You're news, Sonny ... 
  
      SONNY 
    How much you have to pay an 
    entertainer to fill this slot? 
  
      TV NEWSMAN 
    Newsman, not ... 
  
      SONNY 
    Okay, newsman.  How much you make a 
    week? 
     (beat) 
    You're not talkin'.  You payin' me? 
    What have you got for me?  We're 
    givin' you entertainment ... what 
    are you givin' us? 
  
       TV NEWSMAN 
    What do you want us to give you? 
    You want to be paid for ... 
  
      SONNY 
    I don't want to be paid.  I'm here 
    with Sal and eight other people ... 
    and we're dyin'!  They're gonna 
    blow our guts out, man!  You're 
    gonna see our brains onna sidewalk! 
    How's that for all you shut-ins and 
    housewives to look at!  You gonna 
    help, or you just put it on instead 
    of AS THE WORLD TURNS?  We're dyin' 
    here!  What have you got for me? 
  
      TV NEWSMAN 
    You could give up. 
  
      SONNY 
    Oh yeah?  Give up?  You ever been 
    in prison? 
  
 TV Newsman 
 Of course not ... SONNY 
 
 
 Then talk about somethin 'you 
 fuckin' know about ... 
 
 at That instant, the TV screen switches to a 
 PLEASE STAND BY card and we hear an announcer's voice over: 
 
 ANNOUNCER (VO) 
 Ladies and gentlemen, Our 
 transmission 
 Has Been Temporarily interrupted. Please stand by. 

And all with a voltage and a pithing on the characters as the film progresses you remain mesmerized waiting for more and more. And then exit and you say ... I laugh at the American dream.



Note to those who have seen it : on the secret that reveals the character of Sonny, near the end, which breaks the film into two and gives a flying kick in the mouth of the beholder, I say hats off to Lumet for daring to portray a character without taboos or half measures. Plated.


rating: 8

Milena Velba Westy’s Pregnancy

1975 Hard Candy. David Slade. 2005

Hard Candy is a film released earlier this year that was very well received by the lockers under the American independent film taste. I
straight to the point. To me, I did not like. I'm not saying I look bad, but not quite like me so now I will comment. It is noteworthy

the performance of the girl (Ellen Page), of which I knew nothing and that makes a strange role of teen cock psychopath. The type character is Patrick Wilson, one of the actors of the last film version of Phantom of the Opera (I have not seen).

The story tells of pedophilia, both alleged and real, and speaks of guilt and punishment. The difference with other movies is that there is an extreme demagoguery pederast to lead to the end of torture to show us as a victim, for which it serves as a teenage psychopath who hatches a plan sadistic and extreme. That's where the whole movie, in those 100 minutes of sadism and repetition. No more. In the end he presents a kind of explanation as to why the acts, which does nothing but ridicule the plot.
There are movies about pedophiles who cast doubt on the disgust that these people cause, I'm coming to mind Brian Cox in LIE, which embroiders a pederast in the paper which shows a malevolent way, and other "soft" character. But this is not the case.

For speaking the start, I will say that the film shows misleading because it is capable of self-criticism (see the false appearances in musical tastes: Goldfrapp, and the literary reference to a book about Jean Seberg), or directly when they say "this seems a video clip. " Thus, it is easy to want to show different, but artistically it does not go beyond a hidden camera spins the blood to the viewer. There is 360 º scans showing no more than it did before they occur, (of which involved a red screenshots prevend way of the bait). And there's even roll strobes video! If this is added a bluish or greenish (think Traffic but not both), we have a movie modernilla.

Well, good things, and is that force to keep the tension, not moving, entertaining, because the public is ready for a sadistic torture, to blush and expect the worst, and therein lies the tension. No However, there is nothing if you think about it. Yes, I repeat that is passable, and many people say that had a bad time and that patatin ... because it raises an interesting background for many things. Well ...

If you've seen Audition (in IMDB) This movie is the same but changing moral values \u200b\u200bfor pedophilia. The difference is that Audition was fun, there was blood and mayhem. And here, all you have is a director who wants to make a kind of Funny Games (in IMDB) in modernete plan, and no, do not get it.


Rating: 5

Rc Nitro Wheel Loader

Simon of the Desert. Luis Buñuel.

Simon the deierto is a medium length of Luis Buñuel . Lasts 46 minutes and is an unfinished work of genius Calanda. What more can you say about this historical comedy. Well, it depicts the story of Simon, a fourth-century ascetic who, like Jesus Christ revived hopes to be worthy of God by following a path of prayer and fasting. What surrounds the light, is an entourage of monks who worship him and a few people (notable are the old pastor and a taciturn dwarf). In between all this comic situations arise based on religious prejudice and confrontation to live assuming God protocol. The best of the film, unclassifiable for all all is to see Silvia Pinal the role of Satan, tempting variety of ways (very curious all) to Simon.

What lies beneath this work. Then in 1965 he was a genius Buñuel unparalleled recognized everywhere least in Spain. After its initial French Surrealist phase, and later Mexican period, which would be extended many years, Buñuel began to roll from the mid-50 halfway between the two countries, signing works for the French production and the Mexican National Studies. No one can speak of a decline in his work, since a few years then come Belle de Jour, The Milky Way or The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie. Silvia Pinal

me in love with this movie. Choose a woman like her to embody the devil, and do it like a schoolgirl with garters, Shepherd (not pastor) with a beard (and shoot a sheep as in The Golden Age, a dog!) or out of a coffin that comes crawling alone, showing that breast babe Daphne is priceless.

sense of humor is incredible Buñuel. His hatred for the Church is so visceral and so argued verging on the obvious. Speaks of praxis and asceticism, laughs at his dogmas, and like Nietzsche in The Antichrist, tells us that Catholicism is the antithesis of life, a search for unhappiness.

Simon, through his thoughts, points out his carnal existence, his wishes for happiness, and conscious denial comes to show the stupidity of religion. A faith based on denial that incomprehensibly success among the masses.

With a shocking final where he paints a hell sixties appears incredible reflection on life and pleasure, and Simon is portrayed in the figure of another man, who smokes a pipe, and where Claudio Brook , As his alter ego ascetic, he disdains the fun and happiness.

Simon : What do you call that dance?
Satan : "Radioactive Flesh" is the latest ... And the last!

say that along with La Jetée, Chris Marker (1962), is the best medium-length I've ever seen.


A masterpiece of intelligent humor. Behold, behold The life of Brian and look different (the main one here is praxis).

Rating: 10

Reaction About Movie Nars

1965 Apocalypse Now. Francis Ford Coppola. 1979

I love the smell of napalm in the morning.

Based on the novel by Joseph Conrad called The Heart of Darkness , although here the scenario is at war in Vietnam, this film is a basic reference in the history of cinema.
Everyone has seen this movie. No one unfamiliar with the Ride of the Valkyries and thanks to the cargo helicopter to begin shortly. No one ever has not recited the phrase I love the smell of napalm in the morning . And since Marlon Brando traumatic consummated the interpretation of history, everyone intuits what is the horror ...

And to see it uncensored (Redux ) is to see other 50 minutes of story in which they appear drugs, sex and humans. While the dinner scene with the French settlers is a terrible hodgepodge that adds nothing, the scene at the camp with playmates is precious so this gives American time.

As talk of how well it is made or relate the plot is stupid, just because everyone has seen (and no, it enters Filmaffinity or IMDB).
For this reason, tell others details curiosity plan.

First actor who thought Coppola was Steve McQueen. Once heavily involved in the pre-production, the person who would embody the Captain Willard was ... Harvey Keitel ! Yes, you read that right. Occurred two weeks before shooting began, Coppola replaced him with Martin Sheen .
If this is the movie of the impossible, which means to know:

• The shooting of the film lasted for 238 days, a typhoon destroyed the sets and filming had to be paralyzed.
• The March 1, 1977 Martin Sheen suffered a heart attack that kept him out film until April 19, 1977, during which time shots were filmed scenes with substitutes and requerín not the presence of the actor.
• The first scene that was shot was one in a helipcótero Willard takes the boat to the river back.
• The helipcóteros belonged to the Philippine Army who came to stop work to fight the communist guerilla.
• The final election generated many questions and controversies during filming once released, Coppola returned to the source that inspired the script: 'The Heart of Darkness' by Joseph Conrad to write.
• It premiered on August 19, 1979.

also know that the screenplay of Apocalypse Now was originally thought to be directed by George Lucas , which was sponsored by John Milius . It was early 70s and was busy Coppola succeeding with The sponsor. The idea of \u200b\u200bLucas was making a documentary about Vietnam in situ. What happened was that in that situation, the war ended and Lucas lost his mind. In 1976 Lucas was already deep in Star Wars and left Coppola to make the film he wanted on the work of Conrad .

More stuff. Coppola told Al Pacino if he wanted to be Willard, and was told he was not willing to be stuck in a swamp five months. In the end, the shooting lasted 16 months! After spending zillions
months editing the film, Coppola was not happy with some phrases Sheen, and as the voice of the latter was greatly changed by then, used his brother (Joe Estevez ) to repeat a few paragraphs.
The ox that tear at the end, is real.
Sam Bottoms (Lance B. Johnson in the movie is the surfer ) is not the drugged puestísimo but it was LSD, speed and marijuana.
No opening credits. Not even see the title of the film.
Coppola attempted suicide several times throughout the development of pre-post-production.
If you look (that did not know but true) Dennis Hopper and Robert Duvall , the film disappear forever in the same position, squatting.

And not go on because anyone interested in knowing everything, all and all about details like these, you can enter here and continue reading.

Ruben, I hope that what I told you satisfied.


Rating: 10

Ohio County Map Cities

A Year in the moon. Antonio Maria Garate. 2005

English Cinema good, nice and cheap . This movie follows or precedes the wake of DarkBlueAlmostBlack , It's just easier and is told with less artifice, if possible.
The next day morning I got only the movies from my village because the projected regional film library on Fridays at 20h films released earlier this year that are far less flashy. I looked at the argument Filmaffinity and I thought better than to be lying at home, and it lasted no more than an hour and a half.
Director Antonio Maria Garate ten years and directed a film called Kisses and hugs , similar argument. Now comes with it from which not even know its existence.

At the beginning of the film, shot in digital (I think) told me Damn, I hope not as Cesc Gay, pseud thirties because that roll unless I felt like a garlic soup. And soon discover that not. Well! The

actors are largely unknown to me. One of them is the bald The ball (Alberto Jiménez), another is one that appeared in Partners making teacher (I think) and counting. The other, complete strangers are around twenties and I have to say that they do really well.
If the actors from the movie of were Cojonudos Sánchez Arévalo (less Marta Etura that I did not like and was the known) these are not far behind. These are good indicators that there quarry on the English scene . Sends balls that bring Almodovar Penelope Cruz LA (the only movie that is good is The Girl of Your Dreams ) may have Act or for less money. In short, this is another roll.

is technically simple, no camera tricks or turns . The editing is careful, though sometimes there script crap like that girl pulled out of the bar leaving the boy and she is right outside the window of him when she gets out of hand, it is he who runs away to occupy place left it. It is too easy and trite. But hey, I do not spin so fine and see failures here and there. I copy the

Filmaffinity synopsis (I hope not accuse me of plagiarism) because it has everything very clearly and does not reveal anything:
"Looking for a relationship at any price. is in love , want to commit, but all breaks down when they discover that what they have does not go beyond sex. What to do? The action begins in late September. IÑIGO (18) comes to Madrid to study Psychology, and stays in the house of his sister Esther (25), who shares an apartment with Gabriel (30), a writer of short stories porn. She does not go through a good time and did not make any grace the arrival of his brother. Gabriel is delighted. In college, Iñigo meets Sonia, a mysterious girl. You feel very attracted to her, and then begin their problems. Esther works in a travel agency and has a relationship with your boss, Javier (30). Knows that his life is another woman, but Esther is confident that Javier to leave. Gabriel knows ALMUDENA (24), a girl of good family who is getting married to the eternal opposition. Among them is unleashed passion. Everybody sees in secret, sometimes cited in The Moon, a bar in the center of Madrid . Takes Alberto (35) a very excited about your business, but with serious financial problems . Alberto also hides a love story. "


This is a movie close in which you feel identified with the characters' actions. While some events are somewhat bizarre, it only makes you look at the hypothetical For if you had happened to you. It's one of those movies where you smile , you want the character to do the right thing and when you see your grandmother, the old saying out loud No! Let that not for you! And you, as you're polite, you shut up, but wish to tell the person that is wrong, that's not right. And at the end

leave the cinema happy because you have seen a movie unpretentious, mature, has entertained you, you smiled, you put in the air at some point and eventually finished as wanted.

Rating: 7